Mathematics is one of the areas where large language models like ChatGPT are confusing. On the one hand, they can correctly produce the answer to advanced problems such as integration and differentiation, while on the other, they sometimes fail spectacularly at very easy problems, such as comparing two numbers.
In this week’s article, I examine two recent papers that investigate the limits and capabilities of LLMs in math. One of them focuses on ChatGPT in advanced math, and the other explores LLMs in elementary math/word problems.
Some key findings:
LLMs are inconsistent in nearly any math topic
They also fail at elementary math
They might perform decently at one skill, but can’t combine different skills (elementary math+common sense)
LLMs fine-tuned on math datasets improve drastically, but still require further investigation
LLMs can be reliable tools for searching and reverse-searching math knowledge bases
Read the full article on TechTalks.
For more on AI research:
AI as a tool needs continuous review and learning as to its use and application.